•  
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Conferences
  • Services
  • Contact
  • LoginLogin
  • Print FriendlyPrint Friendly
Quick Links

Publications
Browse our extensive list of full text
[Conference Publications.....]


Conferences

47th ASL Congress
29 Sept - 3 Oct
Mandurah WA
[more...]


14th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference
21-25 September, Adelaide SA
[more...]


1st National Diversity on Boards Conference
28-29 May, Sydney NSW
[more...]


2nd National EMS Forum
19-22 May, Newcastle NSW
[more...]


Home > Articles > Regional Australia big loser from datacasting

Regional Australia big loser from datacasting

Claire Braund

August 2000

Regional Australia is the biggest loser from legislation to limit competition in the digital television spectrum. It allows the three commercial broadcasters to retain control of what you watch on TV to 2008. New players are prevented from delivering cheap Internet services to home television sets. The impact on regional Australians still grappling with poor bandwidth on the copper wire network is severe. Regional communities are denied a second Internet platform and access to the information and knowledge economy.

What is this deal, how was it done and why were our rural lobby groups so quiet about it? In this article we assess the true impact of data-casting legislation on regional Australia.

People living in regional Australia will miss out on cheap unlimited Internet access through their television sets under new Government legislation.

The Broadcasting Services Amendment (Digital Television and Data-casting) Bill prevents data-casting, the delivery of Internet through home television sets, in the digital part of the spectrum.

The legislation passed through Parliament in June with the support of Labor and the Democrats.

Digital television is a cheap, effective way of delivering Internet services to country areas suffering from bandwidth problems and lack of competition to Telstra. Using digital technology, information to display the picture and play the sounds is compressed into smaller packages that do not require as much capacity to transmit. This opens up the possibility of sending four channels out where one currently exists.

Many in the industry believe that this would have created a second, vital Internet platform for regional Australia.

Instead of being opened up to competition the spectrum will now be used by the existing free to air operators, Channels Seven, Nine and Ten, and the ABC and SBS, to transmit analogue television and 20 hours per week of High Definition Television (HDTV) until 2008.

HDTV was mandated in 1998 in a deal between the Government and Kerry Packer. While it delivers an excellent picture to those with the thousands of dollars to buy the necessary equipment, HDTV is a bandwidth hungry white elephant that has been used as a convenient excuse to support a monopoly on broadcast licences.

This cost to the taxpayer of allowing the existing TV networks to keep control of the 21MHz of digital spectrum is approximately $3billion.

People living in regional Australia, who do not have access to high-speed Internet connections, are largely tied to the Government owned Telstra. Increased competition would have given Australian consumers access to affordable high-speed, interactive information and entertainment products. Data-casters would have been able to stream audio and video through a data-casting service over the broadcasting bands. In layman's terms we would have been able to get the Internet on our televisions.

It follows that this would have led to packages of free to air TV, multi-channelling, pay TV and Internet services to be offered to regional customers by competing telecommunications providers for a monthly fee. It was feasible that subscribers to this service would have been provided with a set-top box or a new digital television, in order to 'buy' their loyalty.

What the players say

The legislation has been heavily criticised by media, Internet and consumer groups as protective, backward and harmful to the development of digital technology in Australia.

Telecommunications Consultant, Paul Budde, said digital television is more important to people living in regional areas as they do not have access to options available to urban consumers, such as cable TV.

Mr Budde also points out that the digital part of the spectrum is the only area where the Government is regulating technology. In the wireless, cable and satellite parts of the spectrum, the Government regulates content rather than technology. Video and audio can be streamed over all of these other networks.

This is creating an artificial distinction between access technologies. For example broadcasting technologies can’t be used to access the Internet, but telecommunications, cable TV and satellite networks can.

The Australian Consumers Association CHOICE, believes that the legislation is likely to stifle potential technological opportunities for Australian consumers.

Potential data-casters, News Ltd and Fairfax, maintain that in regulating the digital spectrum the Government is preventing people living in regional areas and low income earners from receiving the Internet through a set top box on their television.

(50% of the Australian population do not have a PC and a large proportion of them will never have one. Almost all of them however, have a TV)

News Ltd has said that "If they’re not stopped Alston’s ‘datacasting’ laws will widen the divide between the information rich in the city with their high speed cables and the information poor in the regions with no viable bandwidth options."

The Government’s own Productivity Commission basically advised against all of the elements that the government has legislated. For close to a year the Commission received submissions from across Australia, but none of the recommendations from this very broad-based inquiry have been implemented.

Rural lobby groups, such as the National Farmers Federation, the state farm bodies and local government, have been virtually silent on the legislation.

Reasons for this could include:

  • A lack of understanding of what is a highly complex issue;
  • The timing of the legislation (it was brought in just before the GST); and
  • Lack of cooperation and coordination with Internet groups and data-casters.

Another reason may be an unwillingness to upset a Government that has been and is keen to continue, throwing money at rural and regional Australia. With funds such as Networking the Nation ($400m), Advancing Australia ($525m), the Natural Heritage Trust ($1.5bil) and others, the perception may be that this is worth more to regional Australia than opening up the $3bil digital TV spectrum.

Frustrated Internet users in regional Australia may not agree.

Inquiries and Papers

  1. Productivity Commission Inquiry into Broadcasting, April 2000
    http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/broadcst/index.html
  2. Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Legislation Committee Report from inquiry into the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Digital Television and Datacasting) Bill, June 2000
    http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/erca_ctte/digital/Contents.htm
  3. Australian Consumers Association: Submission to Senate Inquiry
    http://www.choice.com.au/articles/a101460p1.htm
  4. News Limited submission to the Senate Inquiry
    www.regional.org.au/communications
  5. Fred Hilmer, CEO of Fairfax, speech to the National Press Club on 29/06/2000 about data-casting:
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/0006/29/text/national30.html
  6. News Ltd background information on the digital spectrum, data-casting and streaming
    www.regional.org.au/ommunications

Media

  1. Australian Telecommunications Users Group July 2000: Will Broadband evolution be painful
    http://www.atug.com.au/article.cfm?newsid=43&newstype=2
  2. Australian Financial Review 22-23 July 2000, p5: Alston bows to strong Internet lobbying (Katherine Murphy)
    www.afr.com.au
  3. The Australian 11 July 2000, p25: Break the pay TV monopoly, benefit the bush (Paul Budde)
  4. Australian Financial Review 1-2 July 2000, p5: For giddy limits of datacasting, try a fudged policy (Tony Walker)
    www.afr.com.au
  5. The Sydney Morning Herald 30 June 2000: Labor caves in to restrict ABC and SBS digital role (Mark Robinson)
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/0006/30/text/national06.html
  6. The Australian 20 June 2000, p33: Industry slams digital TV bill (Simon Hayes)
  7. Australian Financial Review 17-18 June 2000, p23-25: It's the newest thing but Digital TV in Australia will be a big DUD (Alan Kohler)
    www.afr.com.au
  8. Australian Financial Review 17-18 June 2000, p64: Why my next TV will be a PC (Alan Kohler)
    www.afr.com.au
  9. Australian Consumers' Association 16 June 2000: Australia - Your digital future is just so much burned toast (Charles Britton)
    http://www.choice.com.au/articles/a101460p1.htm
  10. The Australian Industry Standard 4 June 2000: Spectrum Wars (Pete Young)
    http://www.thestandard.com.au/articles/display/0,1449,9411,00.html?related.1449
  11. The Sydney Morning Herald 11 May 2000, p2: Digital TV opens door to the Web (Mark Robinson and Catriona Purcell)
    www.smh.com.au
  12. Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 21 July 2000: Video and audio streaming
    www.richardalston.dcita.gov.au

Government, regulatory bodies and industry associations

  1. Digital Television in Australia. A guide to Australian government sites, digital television standards, audio encoding standards, digital television in other countries and related usenet newsgroup home pages.
    http://www.zipworld.com.au/~quokka/dtvaus/links.html
  2. Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA) The independent federal statutory authority regulating free-to-air radio and television, pay TV, digital broadcasting and Internet content in Australia.
    http://www.aba.gov.au/
  3. The Australian Communications Authority (ACA) regulates telecommunications and radio communications, and has significant consumer protection responsibilities.
    http://www.aca.gov.au/
  4. Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts
    http://www.dcita.gov.au/
  5. Digital Broadcasting Australia is an industry group providing information about, and the promotion of, digital free-to-air television in Australia.
    http://www.dba.org.au/
  6. Internet Industry Association Australia's national industry body for Internet commerce, content and connectivity
    http://www.iia.net.au/index2.html
  7. Australian Subscription Television and Radio Association (ASTRA) is the peak industry body for subscription (multichannel) television and narrow-cast television and radio.
    http://www.astra.org.au/
  8. Australian Consumers Association August 2000: Digital Television … a case of what might have been
    http://www.choice.com.au/articles/PageGenerator.asp?ID=101535&P=01
  9. Paul Budde Communications is a telecommunications and information highway consultancy company specialising in market analysis
    http://www.budde.com.au/

International Sites

  1. US Federal Communications Commission
    http://www.fcc.gov/dtv/
  2. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/digital/
  3. The Digital Television Group
    http://www.dtg.org.uk/
  4. Independent Television Commission (UK)
    http://www.itc.org.uk/
The Regional Institute
© 1999-2005 The Regional Institute Ltd copyright notice and disclaimer
Powered by RegionalNet!